Search

The evaluation focused on assessing the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, and sustainability and scalability of the programme.  The evaluation had two complementary objectives (learning and accountability): (1) Accountability entailed assessing the effectiveness, efficiency, performance and results of FFA activities implemented through previous Country Programme, Protracted Rel

The study explored WFP’s programming in Indonesia and the Philippines, including WFP’s advisory, technical assistance and service provision roles to government and partners and informed the development of this guide (see appendix 2).

The evaluation was conducted between January 2021 and March 2022.

The Ethics Office is required to submit an annual activity report to the Executive Board of WFP.

This Bulletin provides an overview of the ongoing global trends on food availability and prices amidst the current challenging environment. It reviews Indonesia’s current macroeconomic landscape, including implications on the economy due to the global disruptions.

In mid-2021, the fuel and electricity shortages that Lebanon faced as a consequence of the economic crisis became critical, threatening the provision of essential services. Many hospitals and public water supply and wastewater treatment facilities were forced to reduce services, jeopardizing public health and safety amidst the economic crisis and COVID-19 pandemic.

This report captures the multiplier effect of WFP’s voucher modality on the local economy by tracking the changes in key business indicators for a selection of participating shops and dairy producers.

A Field-Level Agreement (FLA) is the main agreement used in all types of NGO partnership arrangements. It is used in all circumstances where NGOs handle WFP resources or implement activities on WFP's behalf. An FLA promotes global consistency in the partnership cycle and gives both parties the assurance that their interests are protected by law. 

The evaluation was undertaken to assess the achievements of the project, draw lessons learned and make recommendations to better inform strategic decision-making on social protection programs. Overarching evaluation questions included: Q.1 To what extent is the Joint Program (JP) appropriate and relevant to the creation of favorable conditions for the National Social Protection Strategy revi