Search

The evaluation was conducted between January 2021 and March 2022.

It covers WFP activities implemented between 2018 and mid-2021 including WFP’s strategic positioning, its effectiveness in contributing to strategic outcomes, the efficiency of ICSP implementation and factors explaining WFP’s performance.  Overall, the evaluation observed that initial optimistic assumptions about the context, security level, emerging crises and partnerships did not materia

It covers WFP activities implemented between 2018 and mid-2021 including WFP’s strategic positioning, its effectiveness in contributing to strategic outcomes, the efficiency of CSP implementation and factors explaining WFP’s performance. The evaluation concluded that: WFP remained a key humanitarian actor in the country, and the CSP framework facilitated its strategic positioning in socia

The evaluation aimed to explore the effects that the presence, programmes and interventions of WFP have on conflict and peace dynamics, relevance of policy implementation measures and enabling and hindering factors. It assessed the relevance, effectiveness, coherence and sustainability of the Policy and its implementation from 2012 to 2021.

It covers WFP activities implemented between 2019 and 2021 and assesses continuity from the previous programme cycle, the extent to which the CSP introduced strategic shifts and implications for such shifts for performance and results. The evaluation concluded that: WFP can report on major achievements as part of the first Nigeria CSP.

It was conducted between June 2021 and June 2022, covering activities implemented from 2019 to October 2021. It also considered preceding operations to assess the strategic shift expected with the introduction of the CSP. The evaluation concluded that:  The first CSP for WFP in Chad has been implemented in an extremely challenging context characterised by multiple crises.

This series of country case studies (Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Fiji, Madagascar and Zambia) focuses on the design of microinsurance programmes and their linkages with social protection, including good practices and recommendations for replication in other countries and the strengthening of cross-functional work.

It was conducted between July 2020 and October 2021 to assess WFP’s strategic positioning and role and the extent to which WFP has made the strategic shift expected by the CSP; WFP’s contributions to strategic outcomes; efficiency and factors that explain WFP performance. The evaluation concluded that: WFP was well aligned with national and policies and UN plans.

Conducted between October 2019 and September 2020, the evaluation assessed WFP’s strategic positioning and role and the extent to which WFP has made the strategic shift expected by the CSP; WFP’s contributions to strategic outcomes; efficiency; factors that explain WFP performance; and the appropriateness of the Level 3 response to the Rohingya crisis. The evaluation concluded that:

The report, completed in partnership with the West Africa Sub-Regional Office for the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA) and the United Nations World Food Programme (WFP), indicates that the proportion of people in the region living with less than $1.90 a day increased from 2.3 per cent in 2020 to 2.9 per cent in 2021.